Compound, Kelp DAO rsETH s\u00f6m\u00fcr\u00fcs\u00fcne yan\u0131t olarak birka\u00e7 piyasada kilit faaliyeti dondurduktan sonra keskin bir geri tepkiyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131; risk kontrol\u00fc hareketi bir kullan\u0131c\u0131 g\u00fcven problemi haline getirdi. Platform, orijinal hack’ten etkilenmedi, ancak etkisi, kay\u0131plar b\u00fcy\u00fcmeden \u00f6nce Compound ve risk ortaklar\u0131n\u0131n sistemin baz\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerini kapatmaya y\u00f6nelmesi kadar h\u0131zl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde bor\u00e7 verme piyasalar\u0131na yay\u0131ld\u0131. Bu yan\u0131t daha fazla zarar\u0131 azaltm\u0131\u015f olabilir, fakat bir\u00e7ok kullan\u0131c\u0131, durumun nas\u0131l ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hissederek kendilerini tuza\u011fa d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015f, yan\u0131lt\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve g\u00f6rmezden gelinmi\u015f hissettiklerini belirtti.<\/p>\n\n
Sorun, Kelp DAO\u2019nun rsETH\u2019sinin Nisan 2026\u2019da b\u00fcy\u00fck bir s\u00f6m\u00fcr\u00fcye maruz kalmas\u0131yla ba\u015flad\u0131. Raporlar, 116.000\u2019den fazla rsETH\u2019nin bo\u015falt\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kay\u0131plar\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k 292\u2011294 milyon dolar aras\u0131nda tahmin edildi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi. rsETH, DeFi i\u00e7inde kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in \u015fok tek bir protokolde kalmad\u0131. Bor\u00e7 verme platformlar\u0131, k\u00f6t\u00fc teminat, bozulmu\u015f destek ya da h\u0131zl\u0131 likidasyonlar\u0131n zarar\u0131 yayabilece\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmek zorunda kald\u0131. Compound, etkilenen Comet piyasalar\u0131nda yeni g\u00fcvenlik \u00f6nlemleri haz\u0131rlan\u0131rken faaliyeti durdurdu. Bu ad\u0131mlar protokol\u00fc korumay\u0131 ama\u00e7lasa da, bir\u00e7ok kullan\u0131c\u0131 i\u00e7in normal i\u015flemleri de engelledi. Kaynaklar.<\/p>\n\n
Compound\u2019da, duraklatma ayarlar\u0131 kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n h\u00e2l\u00e2 yapabildi\u011fi ve yapamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feyler aras\u0131nda kat\u0131 bir b\u00f6l\u00fcnme yaratt\u0131. Durdurulan piyasalarda kullan\u0131c\u0131lar h\u00e2l\u00e2 varl\u0131k temin edebilir, teminat koyabilir ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 geri \u00f6deyebilir. Ancak likidite \u00e7ekemez, teminat \u00e7ekemez veya yeni bor\u00e7 al\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015flatamazlard\u0131. Bu tasar\u0131m \u00f6fkenin odak noktas\u0131 oldu. Baz\u0131 kullan\u0131c\u0131lar fon ekledikten sonra en \u00e7ok istedikleri i\u015flemlerin engellendi\u011fini fark ettiler. Di\u011ferleri ise riskli maruziyet, piyasa b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne k\u0131yasla k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck g\u00f6r\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde bile pozisyonlar\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kamad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ekemediklerini g\u00f6rd\u00fcler.<\/p>\n\n
Bu, hayal k\u0131r\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daha ciddi bir \u015feye d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesiydi. Baz\u0131 kullan\u0131c\u0131lar, uygulaman\u0131n piyasada k\u0131smi bir dondurma oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a bildirmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in Compound\u2019\u0131 yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 davranmakla su\u00e7lad\u0131. Di\u011ferleri daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc ifadeler kullanarak deneyimin bir doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k gibi hissettirdi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi; bu, Compound\u2019\u0131n s\u00f6m\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc planlad\u0131\u011f\u0131na inand\u0131klar\u0131 i\u00e7in de\u011fil, platformun limitleri a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6stermeden para kabul ediyor gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcnmesi nedeniyleydi. Kripto d\u00fcnyas\u0131nda, kullan\u0131c\u0131lar a\u00e7\u0131k kurallar ve h\u0131zl\u0131 g\u00fcncellemeler bekler; bu t\u00fcr bir uyumsuzluk do\u011frudan kay\u0131ptan \u00e7ok g\u00fcveni zedeleyebilir.<\/p>\n\n
Compound\u2019\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131dan bak\u0131\u015f\u0131 daha teknikti. Protokol\u00fcn acil kontrol mekanizmalar\u0131 geni\u015f, kesin olmayan bir yap\u0131ya sahipti. Bir Comet durduruldu\u011funda ayn\u0131 anahtar birden \u00e7ok eylemi ayn\u0131 anda engelliyordu. Bu, platformun yaln\u0131zca k\u00f6t\u00fc teminat yolunu izole edip, ilgili olmayan kullan\u0131c\u0131 ak\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 dokunmadan b\u0131rakmas\u0131n\u0131 zorla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131yordu. Compound ve Gauntlet daha sonra, gerekti\u011finde rsETH maruziyetini k\u0131s\u0131tlamak i\u00e7in limitler ve bor\u00e7\u2011teminat oranlar\u0131n\u0131 s\u0131f\u0131ra ayarlayarak y\u00f6neti\u015fim eylemleri haz\u0131rlad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Ayr\u0131ca Ethereum ve katman\u20112 piyasalar\u0131 i\u00e7in tahmini yeniden a\u00e7\u0131lma tarihlerini payla\u015ft\u0131lar. Risk a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bu net bir pland\u0131. Kullan\u0131c\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ise h\u00e2l\u00e2 ayn\u0131 piyasadaki herkesi etkileyen k\u00f6r bir alet gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyordu.<\/p>\n\n
Olay, bir krizde \u00f6n\u2011u\u00e7 ileti\u015fiminin DeFi\u2019ye ne kadar ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011funu da g\u00f6sterdi. Kullan\u0131c\u0131lar sadece piyasalar\u0131n korunmas\u0131n\u0131 istemiyordu; ayn\u0131 zamanda aray\u00fczde uyar\u0131lar, h\u00e2l\u00e2 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan \u015feylerin basit a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 ve yeni yat\u0131r\u0131mlar yap\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce net bir bildirim istiyordu. Compound temsilcileri daha sonra daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir banner\u2019\u0131n yay\u0131nda olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kabul etti ve bu eksikli\u011fi i\u00e7in \u00f6z\u00fcr diledi. Bu kabul \u00f6nemliydi, ancak kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n ba\u015far\u0131s\u0131z i\u015flemler, s\u0131k\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f fonlar ve belirsiz mesajlar hakk\u0131nda \u015fikayetlerini zaten ilettikten sonra geldi.<\/p>\n\n
Daha geni\u015f piyasa, Compound\u2019\u0131n h\u0131zl\u0131 hareket etmesinin nedenini a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yard\u0131mc\u0131 oldu. Bir di\u011fer b\u00fcy\u00fck bor\u00e7 verme platformu Aave, s\u00f6m\u00fcr\u00fc sonras\u0131 rsETH ve wrsETH piyasalar\u0131n\u0131 dondurdu ve daha sonra WETH piyasalar\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck bir k\u00f6t\u00fc bor\u00e7 bildirdi. Bu, tehlikenin sadece bozuk bir k\u00f6pr\u00fcye sahip tek bir token olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hasar g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f bir varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n bor\u00e7 verme sistemleri \u00fczerinden hareket ederek teminat kalitesini zay\u0131flat\u0131p, y\u00f6neti\u015fimin m\u00fcdahale etmesinden daha h\u0131zl\u0131 kay\u0131plara yol a\u00e7abilece\u011fini ortaya koydu. Bu ortamda Compound, \u00f6nce g\u00fcvenli\u011fi tercih etti. Sorun, g\u00fcvenli\u011fin h\u00e2l\u00e2 adil hissettirmedi\u011fi; \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc normal kullan\u0131c\u0131lar maliyeti \u00fcstleniyor.<\/p>\n\n
Compound\u2019da olanlar art\u0131k tek bir s\u00f6m\u00fcr\u00fcden daha fazlas\u0131. Bir bor\u00e7 verme platformunun acil kontrol mekanizmalar\u0131n\u0131 nas\u0131l y\u00f6netti\u011fi, bu kontrolleri nas\u0131l a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve d\u0131\u015f risk sistemine \u00e7arpt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n ne kadar s\u00fcrt\u00fcnme kabul edece\u011fi konular\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eriyor. Protokol kendini savunmak i\u00e7in hareket etti. Kullan\u0131c\u0131lar ise engellenmi\u015f \u00e7ekimler, engellenmi\u015f bor\u00e7 al\u0131mlar ve yetersiz uyar\u0131lar g\u00f6rd\u00fc. Bu bo\u015fluk \u00f6fkeyi, yanl\u0131\u015f bilgi iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k s\u00f6ylemlerini besledi. Durdurman\u0131n riski s\u0131n\u0131rlamaya yard\u0131mc\u0131 olmas\u0131 h\u00e2l\u00e2 do\u011fru, ancak bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm, DeFi\u2019de protokol\u00fc koruman\u0131n i\u015fin yaln\u0131zca yar\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterdi. Di\u011fer yar\u0131s\u0131, kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n t\u0131klamadan \u00f6nce tam olarak ne oldu\u011funu bilmelerini sa\u011flamak.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Compound, Kelp DAO rsETH s\u00f6m\u00fcr\u00fcs\u00fcne yan\u0131t olarak birka\u00e7 piyasada kilit faaliyeti dondurduktan sonra keskin bir geri tepkiyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131; risk kontrol\u00fc hareketi bir kullan\u0131c\u0131 g\u00fcven problemi haline getirdi. Platform, orijinal hack’ten…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":2515,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ethereum"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2514"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2514\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2516,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2514\/revisions\/2516"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bitcoinnewscrypto.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}